Re granular -- I could be wrong, but these sound like they have some granular to me, albeit not the obvious froggy kind.&nbsp; I actually kind of like the first two - at least the music - which is unprecedented for pop:<br><br>
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GDnqLPEVnY">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GDnqLPEVnY</a><br>(lol she sings part of Carmina Burana)<br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWg3IMN_rhU">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWg3IMN_rhU
</a><br><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HQ6cjDI3tw">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HQ6cjDI3tw</a><br><br>Am I right, is that granular I&#39;m hearing?<br><br>-Chuckk<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/5/07, 
<b class="gmail_sendername">Tim Mortimer</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:timmortimer@d2.net.au">timmortimer@d2.net.au</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>It seems to be predominantly RnB that embraces outwardly &quot;forward thinking&quot;<br>&amp; the most overtly digital stylisations. Although i don&#39;t specifically<br>recall anything &quot;granular&quot; that springs to mind. &quot;Glitchy&quot; &amp; heavily
<br>spliced, maybe. Most other pop genres seemed less likely to wear any overt<br>&quot;experimentation&quot; on their sleeve. &amp;, of course, the ever present Cher vocal<br>effect. But then the old talk box did something similar back in the 70&#39;s
<br>yes?<br></blockquote></div><br>