On Friday 24 March 2006 23:57, Victor Lazzarini wrote:

> The oscil code is very similar to stuff I've seen
> for hardware with no floating-point maths. It's
> great, but hard to read. One problem it has, though,
> is that it becomes somewhat less precise freq-wise as the
> function table size gets very large.

You could use oscilikt instead. It also uses an integer phase
accumulator, but with a resolution of 31 bits, instead of 24 as
in the old oscil opcodes. With high ksmps values, it is also
very similar in terms of performance (unlike poscil), but with
ksmps=1 it is slower than oscili.