On Sunday 29 January 2006 01:04, Robson Cozendey wrote:

> What I dont understand yet is why the equalization table (f-table 5) isn't 
> normalized? If f-table 3 indexes f-table 5 (and sweeps it up an down) and 
> the maximun frequency is given in the other "keqmaxf" parameter, f-table 5 
> shouldn't be normalized to be applied the maximum frequency? What means the 
> variation of f-table 5 between "1" and "32"?
> ...
> /* EQ */
> i_	ftgen 5, 0, 1024, 5, 1, 512, 32, 512, 1

It is normalized, by using a positive GEN routine number. So, the table
really has a range of 0.03125 to 1, and not 1 to 32.