I'm not setting one, so I believe it will default to 4096, no?  That should give me 4096/44100+(# of samples latency in ctrl-panel of asio driver/44100) msec of latency I think.  In this case, that's 4096+256/44100, so shouldn't I expect about 98 ms of latency?  Please correct my understanding of this if I'm wrong. 

Thanks for the reply! b


On 1/10/06, Istvan Varga <istvan_v@fibermail.hu> wrote:
What buffer size settings are you using with Csound ?

On Tuesday 10 January 2006 23:53, Ben McAllister wrote:

> I have a second machine I've performed this test on, a Pentium4 2.4 Ghz,
> WinXP Professional SP2, and I'm still getting 500 ms latency with a Tascam
> US-122 USB interface.  The setting in the ASIO control panel is 256 samples,
> and here Csound is not forcing the control panel to the highest option, as
> on my other machine.
>
> I think with both these machines there is an issue with portaudio, asio, and
> maybe my understanding of how PA and ASIO work together, so I'll do a little
> research and hopefully come up with a fix, or at least more helpful info for
> anyone who can help me. :)  I assume someone else has seen this since I've
> seen it on both these machines.
>
>
> ----
>
> One thing I wanted to ask the list: I'm have Cubase SL/SX installed on each
> of these machines - is anyone else out there running Cubase SL/SX and
> running csound from the cmd line (i.e. NOT CsoundVST)?  Your results may be
> consistent with mine.
>
> In case I didn't mention it before, I get little or no latency within Cubase
> using the ASIO drivers for each device.  Does that maybe indicate a
> Portaudio issue?  Hmm.
>
> Thanks for any help - b
--
Send bugs reports to this list.
To unsubscribe, send email to csound-unsubscribe@lists.bath.ac.uk