I'm not setting one, so I believe it will default to 4096, no?  That should
give me 4096/44100+(# of samples latency in ctrl-panel of asio driver/44100)
msec of latency I think.  In this case, that's 4096+256/44100, so shouldn't
I expect about 98 ms of latency?  Please correct my understanding of this if
I'm wrong.

Thanks for the reply! b


On 1/10/06, Istvan Varga <istvan_v@fibermail.hu> wrote:
>
> What buffer size settings are you using with Csound ?
>
> On Tuesday 10 January 2006 23:53, Ben McAllister wrote:
>
> > I have a second machine I've performed this test on, a Pentium4 2.4 Ghz,
> > WinXP Professional SP2, and I'm still getting 500 ms latency with a
> Tascam
> > US-122 USB interface.  The setting in the ASIO control panel is 256
> samples,
> > and here Csound is not forcing the control panel to the highest option,
> as
> > on my other machine.
> >
> > I think with both these machines there is an issue with portaudio, asio,
> and
> > maybe my understanding of how PA and ASIO work together, so I'll do a
> little
> > research and hopefully come up with a fix, or at least more helpful info
> for
> > anyone who can help me. :)  I assume someone else has seen this since
> I've
> > seen it on both these machines.
> >
> >
> > ----
> >
> > One thing I wanted to ask the list: I'm have Cubase SL/SX installed on
> each
> > of these machines - is anyone else out there running Cubase SL/SX and
> > running csound from the cmd line (i.e. NOT CsoundVST)?  Your results may
> be
> > consistent with mine.
> >
> > In case I didn't mention it before, I get little or no latency within
> Cubase
> > using the ASIO drivers for each device.  Does that maybe indicate a
> > Portaudio issue?  Hmm.
> >
> > Thanks for any help - b
> --
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email to csound-unsubscribe@lists.bath.ac.uk
>