I don't like copying in source trees if possible; maybe it's simple
enough to just create a nother repository in the CVS for dependencies.
 Any binary could go there; it's easy to maintain in CVS but then also
out of the main csound CVS repository.  What does everyone think?

steven


On 12/3/05, Michael Gogins <gogins@pipeline.com> wrote:
> I agree. No prebuilt third party libraries. However, it would be nice to
> have BUILD SYSTEMs for things that are hard to build, or at least
> INSTRUCTIONS.
>
> I don't mind adding build systems to SConstruct for things like liblo. It's
> only necessary on Windows or OS X, usually.
>
> I suggest the convention of simply copying source trees into the opcode
> subdirectory in such cases, as with Loris and STK.
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Istvan Varga" <istvan_v@fibermail.hu>
> To: <csound@lists.bath.ac.uk>
> Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 4:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [Csnd] OSC mingw
>
>
> > On Friday 02 December 2005 20:06, James Hearon wrote:
> >
> >> Also still not sure why mingw doesn't like the original cvs
> >> csound5/windowsdlls/liblo.a
> >
> > Which is another reason to remove it from CVS.
> > --
> > Send bugs reports to this list.
> > To unsubscribe, send email to csound-unsubscribe@lists.bath.ac.uk
> >
>
>
> --
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email to csound-unsubscribe@lists.bath.ac.uk
>