Actually guido had not been adjusted at all, while cabasa and sekere  
had, but incorrectly.  I think the others are OK but I guess I should  
test them all....

Thanks for finding the bug though.  Not sure I have found them all yet  
as I saw different errors to you!

==John ff

Quoting Kevin Welsh <tgrey1@gmail.com>:

> Thanks for the fix & followup jpff!
>
> Sorry, I shouldn't have implied that *all* of the PhISEM opcodes were
> affected, I had tested a few and noticed the odd results.  Since many
> opcodes shared similar parameters and modeling techniques, I figured
> there was likely shared code between them and worded that poorly.
>
> On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 10:31 AM,  <jpff@cs.bath.ac.uk> wrote:
>> Found errors in cabasa and sekere (which is same code as crunch,sandpaper
>> and stix.  Fixed in git
>>
>>