These can be explained by the fact that oscil et al phase
accumulator will have its precision dependent on the size
of the table (because they use integer maths).

You could try poscil to see if this "problem" is less
apparent, as it uses 64-bit floating point indexing.

Victor

----- Original Message -----
From: Jacob Joaquin <jacobjoaquin@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, January 31, 2008 8:02 pm
Subject: [Csnd] [thread@cSounds] difference between phasor and tablei opcodes
To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk

>
> There is a thread in the forums at cSounds about micro frequency
> differencesbetween phasor and oscili. In a nutshell,
> phasor's 440hz is slightly
> different than oscili's 440hz. This causes sine waves to
> eventually drift
> until they're 180 out of phase. More here:
>
>
> "difference between phasor and tablei opcodes"
> http://www.csounds.com/node/36
>
>
> Any thoughts or explanations?
>
> Best,
> Jake
> ----
> The Csound Blog
> http://www.thumbuki.com/csound/blog/
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-
> thread%40cSounds--difference-between-phasor-and-tablei-opcodes-
> tp15213360p15213360.htmlSent from the Csound - General mailing
> list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body
> "unsubscribe csound"