Agreed,
I also have another question:
The examples for each opcode uses different "approaches", for example
the oscil example defines named input variables,
but the prepiano example just use numbers.
I find that the way it's done in the oscil example is more readable,
but it will lead to a lot of example code for more complex opcodes
(e.g. prepiano with 17 input parameters, or partikkel with 40).
I think the readability issue is even more important for the complex opcodes,
what do others think ?

Oeyvind

2008/1/22, Rory Walsh <rorywalsh@ear.ie>:
> I notice that only some of the entries to the Csound manual list the
> version of Csound that the opcodes was first released in. Could we make
> this standard?
>
> Rory.
>
>
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"
>