In this religious battle, I am an emacs-faithful. I could
never stand ed, so vi and vim have never attracted me.
I like the idea that you can do almost anything out of
emacs (except making toast perhaps).

Victor

----- Original Message -----
From: Julien Claassen <julien@c-lab.de>
Date: Monday, January 7, 2008 11:52 am
Subject: [Csnd] Re: Editors
To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk

> Hi!
> Sorry John to contradict here. Maybe emacs was first with
> colourised csound.
> But there are scripts for vim nowadays, that also enable syntax-
> highlighting
> for csound. And as a blind person I have to say that vim is much
> more
> (over-seeable) than emacs. Especially if you're used to ed. Then
> vim is much
> more comfortable, I believe.
> But weel here we go again into the religious debate of
> vim and emacs.
> So perhaps both reasonable editors and the rest is up to
> one's liking. Emacs
> may still have a few luxury-features, tht vim doesn't, but vim
> is more up to
> the basics of it.
> Kindest regards
> Julien
>
> --------
> Music was my first love and it will be my last (John Miles)
>
> ======== FIND MY WEB-PROJECT AT: ========
> http://ltsb.sourceforge.net
> the Linux TextBased Studio guide
> ======= AND MY PERSONAL PAGES AT: =======
> http://www.juliencoder.de
>
>
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body
> "unsubscribe csound"