yes, I think the request was table related

----- Original Message -----
From: jpff@cs.bath.ac.uk
Date: Saturday, August 22, 2009 8:32 am
Subject: [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: PMAX-question
To: csound@lists.bath.ac.uk

> Interesting; is it really only for f tables? If so there
> may be a quick
> patch while we work out how to do it correctly!
>
> > It could also affect the cache. Now it needs about 4 KB (or 8
> KB with
> > doubles) for every instrument invocation. With level 1 cache being
> > typically 32 KB, that makes 8 simultaneous instrument
> invocations before
> > level 1 cache runs out (which would make processing slower).
> So if PMAX
> > is increased, it may slow down CSound.
>
> >
> > By the way, wasn't this requested for tables? Perhaps making PMAX
> > different for tables and instrument invocations would solve
> the problem,
> > for more p-fields in instrument invocations there is no
> demand, I think.
> >
> > Mark
>
> ==John ff
>
>
>
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa@lists.bath.ac.uk with body
> "unsubscribe csound"

Dr Victor Lazzarini, Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Music,
National University of Ireland, Maynooth