Yes, you're right.
Oeyvind


2007/12/11, victor <Victor.Lazzarini@nuim.ie>:
>
>  Well, that depends, because if the transfer functions differ
> a lot, then you might get clicks, as the resulting waveform
> might have a big jump between samples. If however you are
> using well-behaved polynomials, then the difference between
> the curves might be smooth enough. Also remember that
> by just drawing transfer functions it is very easy to get
> non-bandlimited signals. Polynomials are generally your
> best bet.
>
> Victor
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Oeyvind Brandtsegg <obrandts@gmail.com>
> *To:* Csound mailing list address <csound@lists.bath.ac.uk>
> *Sent:* Monday, December 10, 2007 10:19 PM
> *Subject:* [Csnd] dynamic wavetables, was: phase shaping
>
>
> All this talk about phase shaping and rewriting tables got me thinking.
> Is there something hindering us from algorithmically rewriting wavetables
> on the fly ?
> I figure, if the rewriting is happening at the exact same rate as the
> table reading, we would not get unwanted clicks or discontinuities.
> Or ?
>
> Oeyvind
>
>