Thanks for testing, this is indeed interesting.
Is there any further speedups or system optimizations that could be
available on  Linux ? e.g. Does it matter if the core is patched for
realtime performance (even if the task used for benchmarking is an
offline render).

best
Oeyvind

2007/1/23, Michael Gogins <gogins@pipeline.com>:
> On my Toshiba Qosmio, 1 GB RAM, Intel T2400 CPU at 1.83 GHz, I rendered
> examples/trapped-high-resolution.csd using Csound 5.04.1 beta on:
>
> Windows XP Media Center Edition version 2002 SP 2: CPU 103.462 seconds
> Ubuntu 6.10:                                       CPU  95.570 seconds.
>
> Several trials had comparable results. Both versions were compiled with gcc
> 3.4 and g++ 3.4.
>
> So, in response to an earlier thread, Csound rendering -- other things being
> equal, which they rarely are -- should run about 8% faster on Linux.
>
> I will report on gcc 4.1 later.
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Csound-devel mailing list
> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net