I agree. Altho8gh I am a staunch supporter of backwards compatibility, I don't want to obsess over it. In my view, backward compatibility exists to the degree necessary to support a tradition in Csound, and no further. That is, to keep Csound pieces that are performed, and that are used for teaching, working. No more. So, if something is funny and we only just noticed, but nobody knows about any pieces that use it, we should just change it and make a note.

Regards,
Mike

-----Original Message-----
>From: jpff@cs.bath.ac.uk
>Sent: Oct 25, 2007 11:43 AM
>To: Developer discussions 
>Subject: Re: [Cs-dev] Hilbert bug
>
>I would prefer to fix the code and add a warning in the manual, rather as 
>Steven says
>==John ff
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
>Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
>Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
>Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
>_______________________________________________
>Csound-devel mailing list
>Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net