Andres,

I have the Music360 manual only in printed (typed) form. It runs well over 
100 pages.

I'd be happy to scan the GEN routine section (13 pages), and perhaps the 
other Score function "cards" (S, T, R, F, etc.) Also there are 4-5 prefatory 
and overview pages that might well be interesting.

Let me know if these would be of value to anyone. (The date is 1973.)

Art Hunkins

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andres Cabrera" 
To: "Art Hunkins" 
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: [Cs-dev] Draft Release Notes: Sone Plugin


Hi Art,

I'm curious, can you share a copy of the manual if you have it in
electronic form?

I have a digitized copy of the music IV manual if you want to see it.

Cheers,
Andrés

On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Art Hunkins  wrote:
> John,
>
> Yes, your suggestion should work.
>
> FWIW, here is the complete page from the Music360 manual:
>
> GEN13
>
> This routine simply stores 512 values along a monotonic curve, like GEN01;
> but in this case only the first and last values are specified and
> interpolation is made according to the sone scale of amplitude 
> relationship.
> This scale was devised by S.S. Stevens, and is described in his article 
> "The
> Measurement of Loudness" in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of
> America, Vol 27, No. 5, Sept. 1955.) Thus GEN13 may provide a better
> approximation to perceived loudness than GEN01 or any other 
> GEN-subroutine.
>
> P4 and P5 specify the initial and terminal values, and all other parameter
> fields are ignored.
>
> Art Hunkins
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "jpff" 
> To: "Art Hunkins" ; "Developer discussions"
> 
> Cc: 
> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 1:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [Cs-dev] Draft Release Notes: Sone Plugin
>
>
>> Art
>>  There is a real problem with making the perceived and physical value
>>  coincide at zero as the formula is per = k * phy^alpha and this
>>  collapses at zero values.  If anyone had the code from Music360, or
>>  even the manual page, it might be possible to determine what is
>>  required.
>>    One could fiddle so zero at start of table, next point agrees and
>>  then follow the formula.  Would that be OK?
>> ==John ffitch
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Csound-devel mailing list
>> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Csound-devel mailing list
> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel
>



-- 


Andrés 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net