| Erreur: indice hors de gamme?
========================
Prof. Victor Lazzarini
Dean of Arts, Celtic Studies, and Philosophy,
Maynooth University,
Maynooth, Co Kildare, Ireland
Tel: 00 353 7086936
Fax: 00 353 1 7086952
> On 20 May 2017, at 17:32, jpff wrote:
>
> tee is just one tat neeeds a Frenc traslation
>
> msgid "Error: index out of range\n"
>
> I culd try but my French is very bd -- only exam I ever failed, often.
>
>
> On Sat, 20 May 2017, Steven Yi wrote:
>
>> Okay I will wait to create a release branch until tomorrow (I will be away
>> from computer rest of today). If everything is sorted for strings, I'll make
>> the branch in the morning.
>> On Sat, May 20, 2017, 12:02 PM jpff wrote:
>> itroduces new strings to translate; do need a french traslation
>>
>> On Sat, 20 May 2017, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
>>
>> > Merged 1. so I think we’re good to go after checking what we
>> will do with 2.
>> > ========================
>> > Prof. Victor Lazzarini
>> > Dean of Arts, Celtic Studies, and Philosophy,
>> > Maynooth University,
>> > Maynooth, Co Kildare, Ireland
>> > Tel: 00 353 7086936
>> > Fax: 00 353 1 7086952
>> >
>> >> On 20 May 2017, at 16:20, Victor Lazzarini
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I am reviewing 1.. As for 2., if there is one, it would be good
>> to have a package built for it. I don’t think it
>> >> would delay the release (can be added to it), but it should
>> figure in the release notes.
>> >> ========================
>> >> Prof. Victor Lazzarini
>> >> Dean of Arts, Celtic Studies, and Philosophy,
>> >> Maynooth University,
>> >> Maynooth, Co Kildare, Ireland
>> >> Tel: 00 353 7086936
>> >> Fax: 00 353 1 7086952
>> >>
>> >>> On 20 May 2017, at 16:14, Steven Yi
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi All,
>> >>>
>> >>> I think we're mostly there to release, but there's two open
>> items I see:
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. There's a pull request for index boundary checking in
>> getrow/setrow
>> >>>
>> >>> 2. There's mention of a WASM compile
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I only briefly looked at #1 and it seems straightforward.
>> Should we
>> >>> merge it in?
>> >>>
>> >>> As for WASM, I'm thinking we can just move forward with the
>> release
>> >>> and do a latter WASM release once that is tested a bit and
>> packaging
>> >>> all sorted out.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks!
>> >> |