[Csnd-dev] question regarding fractional instrument numbers
Date | 2018-10-21 14:54 |
From | Dave Seidel |
Subject | [Csnd-dev] question regarding fractional instrument numbers |
Given instrument 99, does Csound consider instances called 99.1 and 99.10 to be the same, or are they distinct? In other words, are trailing zeroes significant in fractional instrument numbers?
Thanks, Dave |
Date | 2018-10-21 15:21 |
From | jpff |
Subject | Re: [Csnd-dev] question regarding fractional instrument numbers |
Not checke but I think it follows the usual rules of gdecimal fractions as it is read with the same oe as other score arguments On Sun, 21 Oct 2018, Dave Seidel wrote: > Given instrument 99, does Csound consider instances called 99.1 and 99.10 to > be the same, or are they distinct? In other words, are trailing > zeroes significant in fractional instrument numbers? > > Thanks, > Dave > > |
Date | 2018-10-21 15:33 |
From | Dave Seidel |
Subject | Re: [Csnd-dev] question regarding fractional instrument numbers |
So that means that trailing zeroes are not significant, correct? This is what I'd expect, but did not want to make assumptions given that a Csound score is not C code. On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 10:21 AM jpff <jpff@codemist.co.uk> wrote: Not checke but I think it follows the usual rules of gdecimal fractions as |
Date | 2018-10-21 16:41 |
From | jpff |
Subject | Re: [Csnd-dev] question regarding fractional instrument numbers |
yes I just checked te code. It isa decimal fraction not a code On Sun, 21 Oct 2018, Dave Seidel wrote: > So that means that trailing zeroes are not significant, correct? This is what > I'd expect, but did not want to make assumptions given that a Csound score is > not C code. > > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 10:21 AM jpff |