Re: [Cs-dev] Syntactic sugar request
Date | 2005-11-09 20:44 |
From | Victor Lazzarini |
Subject | Re: [Cs-dev] Syntactic sugar request |
That's what I was asking myself. Are we not making it more complicated than it should be? Victor > > Richard Dobson wrote: > > > But maybe it is all too complicated, and rebuilding apps > > each time the API is changed is easier. > > Maybe I missed some important detail, but why would any > addition of a new function break existing code ? > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo > App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win > a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here > to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php > _______________________________________________ > Csound-devel mailing list > Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Csound-devel mailing list Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net |
Date | 2005-11-09 22:48 |
From | Richard Dobson |
Subject | Re: [Cs-dev] Syntactic sugar request |
Victor Lazzarini wrote: > That's what I was asking myself. Are we not making it > more complicated than it should be? > > Victor > > Very possibly. But having seen how the API has grown in size over its lifetime leaves me thinking it will continue to do so (though one supposes at a slower rate), and declaring the API "finished" may be less than straightforward, and ultimately a little arbitrary, under pressure for a final release. I undertsand there are some free function pointer slots "reserved for future use", so maybe there is no problem. Of course, when I originally proposed the extensible route, the API was a lot smaller! But in principle it seems likely that as new facilties continue to be added to Csound, and host application developers quite reasonably want to have ever more fine-grained control, "we ain't seen nuthin' yet". In which case, there could yet be a case for an API that is extensible, modular, or whatever the correct term is. Richard Dobson ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Csound-devel mailing list Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net |