| Well, let's remove it and see if it still works.
Victor
On 7 Jul 2011, at 01:08, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Why does swig use -includeall? The SWIG documentation says it normally
> is not usually required:
>
> The reason for ignoring traditional includes is that you often don't
> want SWIG to try and wrap everything included in standard header
> system headers and auxiliary files.
>
> I tend to agree. Files should be included explicitly with the %include
> operator, while includes only necessary for the embedded code shoould
> be marked with the #include operator
> .
>
>
> --
>
> Saludos,
> Felipe Sateler
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously
> valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance,
> security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and
> makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Csound-devel mailing list
> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel
Dr Victor Lazzarini
Senior Lecturer
Dept. of Music
NUI Maynooth Ireland
tel.: +353 1 708 3545
Victor dot Lazzarini AT nuim dot ie
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net |