Following the report by Joe I looked at the out family of opcodes and
noted that if nchnls is 1 (mono) then outs2 will overwrite , and so
will outq1 etc.  In other cases the "extra" signals are quietly ignored.
I think is should be policed at init time where possible.  is that
acceptable?

I have the code running -- but should it be an init or perf error, or just 
a 
warning?


On Tue, 27 Dec 2016, jpff wrote:

> Following the report by Joe I looked at the out family of opcodes and
> noted that if nchnls is 1 (mono) then outs2 will overwrite , and so
> will outq1 etc.  In other cases the "extra" signals are quietly ignored.
> I think is should be policed at init time where possible.  is that
> acceptable?
> ==John ffitch

Just a warning I think.

Victor Lazzarini
Dean of Arts, Celtic Studies, and Philosophy
Maynooth University
Ireland

> On 27 Dec 2016, at 14:51, jpff  wrote:
> 
> I have the code running -- but should it be an init or perf error, or just a warning?
> 
> 
>> On Tue, 27 Dec 2016, jpff wrote:
>> 
>> Following the report by Joe I looked at the out family of opcodes and
>> noted that if nchnls is 1 (mono) then outs2 will overwrite , and so
>> will outq1 etc.  In other cases the "extra" signals are quietly ignored.
>> I think is should be policed at init time where possible.  is that
>> acceptable?
>> ==John ffitch

yes i think too
	j


On 27/12/16 16:01, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
> Just a warning I think.
>
> Victor Lazzarini
> Dean of Arts, Celtic Studies, and Philosophy
> Maynooth University
> Ireland
>
>> On 27 Dec 2016, at 14:51, jpff  wrote:
>>
>> I have the code running -- but should it be an init or perf error, or just a warning?
>>
>>
>>> On Tue, 27 Dec 2016, jpff wrote:
>>>
>>> Following the report by Joe I looked at the out family of opcodes and
>>> noted that if nchnls is 1 (mono) then outs2 will overwrite , and so
>>> will outq1 etc.  In other cases the "extra" signals are quietly ignored.
>>> I think is should be policed at init time where possible.  is that
>>> acceptable?
>>> ==John ffitch
>>>

I agree with just a warning.

Regards,
Mike

-----------------------------------------------------
Michael Gogins
Irreducible Productions
http://michaelgogins.tumblr.com
Michael dot Gogins at gmail dot com


On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 2:55 PM, joachim heintz  wrote:
> yes i think too
>         j
>
>
>
> On 27/12/16 16:01, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
>>
>> Just a warning I think.
>>
>> Victor Lazzarini
>> Dean of Arts, Celtic Studies, and Philosophy
>> Maynooth University
>> Ireland
>>
>>> On 27 Dec 2016, at 14:51, jpff  wrote:
>>>
>>> I have the code running -- but should it be an init or perf error, or
>>> just a warning?
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 27 Dec 2016, jpff wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Following the report by Joe I looked at the out family of opcodes and
>>>> noted that if nchnls is 1 (mono) then outs2 will overwrite , and so
>>>> will outq1 etc.  In other cases the "extra" signals are quietly ignored.
>>>> I think is should be policed at init time where possible.  is that
>>>> acceptable?
>>>> ==John ffitch
>>>>
>>