Csound Csound-dev Csound-tekno Search About

[CSOUND-DEV:5444] Re: [Csnd] OSC in csound5

Date2004-11-17 16:29
From"gogins@pipeline.com"
Subject[CSOUND-DEV:5444] Re: [Csnd] OSC in csound5
Depending on who wrote the code, and what that code is trying to do, the
differences between POSIX and Windows for sockets are either (a) minimal or
(b) vast. It _should_ be minimal in this case. One difference that I recall
is in writing a select() loop, since the socket objects in Windows are not
really file handles.

Original Message:
-----------------
From:  jpff@codemist.co.uk
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 07:48:56 +0000
To: csound-dev@eartha.mills.edu
Subject: [CSOUND-DEV:5442] Re: [Csnd] OSC in csound5


The interface to C++ is more complex and adds extra weight.  I have
been looking at liblo which is much simpler (I can resolve the licence
issue -- I have been in touch with author) but that has not been run
on Windows.  Not sure how different socket code is for Windows, but
the whole library is definitely small.
==John ffitch


--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .

Date2004-11-22 06:31
Fromjpff@codemist.co.uk
Subject[CSOUND-DEV:5456] Re: [Csnd] OSC in csound5
The code for liblo does not use select, although an example use does.
It still looks the simplest package, but a little more assurance on
Windows is needed.
==John ffitch