Csound Csound-dev Csound-tekno Search About

[Cs-dev] Problems with compiling opcode for 64-bit on Mac

Date2013-05-23 15:03
Fromlars eri
Subject[Cs-dev] Problems with compiling opcode for 64-bit on Mac
AttachmentsNone  None  
>Just to double check, you posted this earlier:
>
>
>To Steven Yi:
>otool command result:
>libLaivConv.dylib:
>/usr/local/lib/libLaivConv.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current
>version 1.0.0)
>/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current
>version 159.1.0)
>
>file command result:
>libLaivConv.dylib: Mach-O 64-bit dynamically linked shared library x86_64
>
>
>Which only shows x86_64. Is this not the opcode library you built?
Indeed, that is quite strange. I double checked, and yes, that is the output I get with the correct .dylib. I'm not too well versed in all this architecture stuff, so all I can say with certainty is that my Xcode architecture settings are:
Architectures: 64-bit Intel
Base SDK: Latest Mac OS X (Mac OS X 10.7)
Build active architectures only: Yes (I tried No also, didn't help)
supported platforms: macosx
Valid architectures: i386 x86_64
I don't know if that helps.
-Lars

Date2013-05-23 16:20
FromSteven Yi
SubjectRe: [Cs-dev] Problems with compiling opcode for 64-bit on Mac
Hi Lars,

I think the thing to do is make sure Architectures lists both i386 and
x86_64, as well as have build active architecture only set to no.  You
have "Architectures: 64-bit Intel" listed and it should probably have
both 32-bit and 64-bit options.  This value is different than valid
architectures.

steven

On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 3:03 PM, lars eri  wrote:
>>Just to double check, you posted this earlier:
>>
>>
>>To Steven Yi:
>>otool command result:
>>libLaivConv.dylib:
>>/usr/local/lib/libLaivConv.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current
>>version 1.0.0)
>>/usr/lib/libSystem.B.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current
>>version 159.1.0)
>>
>>file command result:
>>libLaivConv.dylib: Mach-O 64-bit dynamically linked shared library x86_64
>>
>>
>>Which only shows x86_64. Is this not the opcode library you built?
>
> Indeed, that is quite strange. I double checked, and yes, that is the output
> I get with the correct .dylib. I'm not too well versed in all this
> architecture stuff, so all I can say with certainty is that my Xcode
> architecture settings are:
>
> Architectures: 64-bit Intel
>
> Base SDK: Latest Mac OS X (Mac OS X 10.7)
>
> Build active architectures only: Yes (I tried No also, didn't help)
>
> supported platforms: macosx
>
> Valid architectures: i386 x86_64
>
> I don't know if that helps.
>
> -Lars
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
> New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service
> that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
> browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
> and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
> _______________________________________________
> Csound-devel mailing list
> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service 
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net