[Csnd-dev] pfields > 2000
Date | 2025-05-08 11:28 |
From | Eduardo Moguillansky |
Subject | [Csnd-dev] pfields > 2000 |
I had submitted a PR long ago which fixed this problem, but it seems to not have been applied to csound 7. Whenever the number of pfields exceeds 2000 csound crashes. I don't have the code anymore Test code: <CsoundSynthesizer> <CsOptions> -odac </CsOptions> <CsInstruments> sr = 44100 ksmps = 64 nchnls = 2 0dbfs = 1 instr 10 ipfields[] passign 4 printarray ipfields turnoff endin instr 20 ipfields[] genarray 0, 2000 ipfields[0] = 10 ipfields[1] = 0 ipfields[2] = 1 schedule ipfields turnoff endin </CsInstruments> <CsScore> i 20 0 1 </CsScore> </CsoundSynthesizer> |
Date | 2025-05-08 11:59 |
From | Victor Lazzarini <000010b17ddd988e-dmarc-request@LISTSERV.HEANET.IE> |
Subject | Re: [Csnd-dev] [EXTERNAL] [Csnd-dev] pfields > 2000 |
Do you have the PR number? Prof. Victor Lazzarini
Maynooth University
Ireland
On 8 May 2025, at 11:33, Eduardo Moguillansky <eduardo.moguillansky@gmail.com> wrote:
|
Date | 2025-05-08 12:22 |
From | Eduardo Moguillansky |
Subject | Re: [Csnd-dev] [EXTERNAL] [Csnd-dev] pfields > 2000 |
On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 12:59 PM Victor Lazzarini <000010b17ddd988e-dmarc-request@listserv.heanet.ie> wrote:
|
Date | 2025-05-08 17:52 |
From | Eduardo Moguillansky |
Subject | Re: [Csnd-dev] [EXTERNAL] [Csnd-dev] pfields > 2000 |
I can post a PR later today On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 1:22 PM Eduardo Moguillansky <eduardo.moguillansky@gmail.com> wrote:
|
Date | 2025-05-08 19:37 |
From | Victor Lazzarini <000010b17ddd988e-dmarc-request@LISTSERV.HEANET.IE> |
Subject | Re: [Csnd-dev] [EXTERNAL] [Csnd-dev] pfields > 2000 |
No need, I have all I require there. Leave it with me, there's some internal changes that I may need to look after (6->7)
Thanks
Prof. Victor Lazzarini
Maynooth University
Ireland
On 8 May 2025, at 17:53, Eduardo Moguillansky <eduardo.moguillansky@gmail.com> wrote:
|
Date | 2025-05-08 21:11 |
From | Eduardo Moguillansky |
Subject | Re: [Csnd-dev] [EXTERNAL] [Csnd-dev] pfields > 2000 |
The schedule opcode itself also needs changes, that was not part of the original PR: There is also some wasteful copying of memory, where an EVTBLK is created and filled with an .extra chunk only to dispose the memory right after that. On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 8:37 PM Victor Lazzarini <000010b17ddd988e-dmarc-request@listserv.heanet.ie> wrote:
|
Date | 2025-05-08 21:17 |
From | Victor Lazzarini <000010b17ddd988e-dmarc-request@LISTSERV.HEANET.IE> |
Subject | Re: [Csnd-dev] [EXTERNAL] [Csnd-dev] pfields > 2000 |
yes, I realised the schedule opcode needs to be able to access the extra field. I am considering now whether we may just go for a fully dynamic memory arrangement and dispense with the extra field. It may be the best solution now, but it’s a lot more involved. ======================== Prof. Victor Lazzarini Maynooth University Ireland > On 8 May 2025, at 21:11, Eduardo Moguillansky |
Date | 2025-05-08 22:09 |
From | Eduardo Moguillansky |
Subject | Re: [Csnd-dev] [EXTERNAL] [Csnd-dev] pfields > 2000 |
The fact that this went so long unnoticed is an indication that long events are probably not the norm. In that case, it might be practical to just keep the current design. Probably also the array version of the "ftgen" opcode needs to be looked after, since it also uses the EVTBLK struct. On Thu, May 8, 2025 at 10:17 PM Victor Lazzarini <000010b17ddd988e-dmarc-request@listserv.heanet.ie> wrote: yes, I realised the schedule opcode needs to be able to access the extra field. |
Date | 2025-05-09 00:12 |
From | Victor Lazzarini <000010b17ddd988e-dmarc-request@LISTSERV.HEANET.IE> |
Subject | Re: [Csnd-dev] [EXTERNAL] [Csnd-dev] pfields > 2000 |
I got this mod done now and it’s passing all the tests. I think it’s probably a good idea to make it dynamic at least in the case of realtime events. ======================== Prof. Victor Lazzarini Maynooth University Ireland > On 8 May 2025, at 22:09, Eduardo Moguillansky |