| Thanks for looking into Mac scons. I would recommend posting again with
somewhat different wording. Have you googled their mailing lists? What
exactly is the problem with pathnames - is this something I might be able
to fix in SConstruct?
Original Message:
-----------------
From: Anthony Kozar anthony.kozar@utoledo.edu
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 02:51:45 -0400
To: csound-dev@eartha.mills.edu
Subject: [CSOUND-DEV:4450] Re: Csound5
Here is the state for various Mac versions and machines:
OS 9 (Carbon) MacPython 2.3.3
OS 8-9 (non-Carbon) 2.2.3
System 7 (PowerPC) not sure (at least 1.5.2)
System 7 (68K) 1.5.2
MacOS X 10.3 MacPython 2.3 installed, difficult to upgrade
OS X 10.2 command-line 2.2 installed, MacPython 2.3.3 available
OS X 10.1 apparently no binary distribution exists (building
Unix python from source would probably work)
I only use the non-Carbon version on OS 9, so I am stuck at 2.2.3. There
may or may not ever be any new releases for OS 9 -- seems to be up in the
air.
Csound currently runs on all PowerPC and 68K Macs running System 7 or later.
And Scons only requires Python 1.5.2, so it is not out of the question to
use it to build Csound on a 68K Mac.
However, I can certainly continue to build Csound without Scons if
necessary. So, please do whatever you feel is necessary. The lack of a
decent version of Python for OS X 10.1 users is a little bit disturbing
though.
I did start working on a Mac port of Scons a couple of weeks ago but hit a
snag due to improper platform-neutral handling of path names. I posted on
the Scons dev list, but no one replied.
Anthony Kozar
anthony.kozar@utoledo.edu
On 4/5/04 10:37 PM, Michael Gogins etched in stone:
> I did not do anything about Python version. Should we keep the Python
level
> "low" or should we assume that anyone who wants to build Csound5 with
scons
> is probably up to getting the current version?
--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ . |