| This might make sense, if larger tables caused more cache misses.
Regards,
Mike
On 1/20/12, Victor Lazzarini wrote:
> I came across this interesting performance stat. Oscillator performance
> seems to depend on table size.
> Running an oscillator for 1000 seconds -
>
> length: 2 ^ 24 ,
> poscil -> CPU: 1.918s
> oscili -> CPU: 3.101s
>
> length: 2 ^ 20
> poscii -> CPU: 0.913s
> oscili -> CPU: 2.032s
>
> length: 2 ^ 14
> poscil -> CPU: 0.722s
> oscili -> CPU: 0.860s
>
>
> ==================
>
> Dr Victor Lazzarini
> Senior Lecturer
> Dept. of Music
> NUI Maynooth Ireland
> tel.: +353 1 708 3545
> Victor dot Lazzarini AT nuim dot ie
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
> The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
> is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
> Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
> _______________________________________________
> Csound-devel mailing list
> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel
>
--
Michael Gogins
Irreducible Productions
http://www.michael-gogins.com
Michael dot Gogins at gmail dot com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net |