I think "Csound," literally, is a great name because that's exactly what it
is. What do you think?

I'm very happy to see so many people, including you, getting traction with
upgrading Csound. I think we can see a very substantially improved musical
instrument in our futures.

This multi-instancing thing, for example, will mean that ordinary studio
musicians can use Csound in sequencers without wondering why they can only
have one plugin running at a time.

Original Message:
-----------------
From: John ffitch jpff@cs.bath.ac.uk
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 05:47:44 +0000 (GMT)
To: csound-dev@eartha.mills.edu
Subject: [CSOUND-DEV:3526] Re: Reset in Csound5


On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Michael Gogins wrote:

> I presume when you mean "environment" you mean passing a pointer to the
> GLOBALS struct to the reset functions.
> 

Yes.  As I move to multiple instances the name GLOBALS seems less helpful 
-- it did start as exactly a structure of all globals but things are 
changing.  How about renaming this to ENV or CSOUND or some better name?  

Last night I got a little further with moving to a passed (pointer to) the 
GLOBAL structure in the plugins.  This is requiring changes in the base, 
and I want to do the same basic change to OOps, Engine etc as soon the 
Opcodes are done.

==John ff


--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .