[Csnd-dev] printk problem
| Date | 2018-01-03 12:45 |
| From | jpff |
| Subject | [Csnd-dev] printk problem |
I have been looking at the code in OOps/ugrw1.c but am finding it very
confusing. Adding various tracing shows that the first kcycle (CS_KCNT ==
1) has time 0.01s when I would has assumed it ran at time zero.
new alloc for instr 1:
printkset: ctime = 4.000000 initime = 0.000000
printk: KCNT = 1
timel = 0.010000 cycles = 0 cysofar = 1.000001
i 1 time 0.01000: 1.00000
printk: KCNT = 2
timel = 0.020000 cycles = 0 cysofar = -0.000000
printk: KCNT = 3
timel = 0.030000 cycles = 0 cysofar = -0.000000
printk: KCNT = 4
timel = 0.040000 cycles = 0 cysofar = -0.000000
.....
I would have thought that the first cycle (1) would have time 0 but the
calculation is
timel = ((MYFLT) CS_KCNT * CS_ONEDKR) - p->initime;
which gives the 0.01 value. Equally confusing is the time printed is
not timel but
csound->icurTime/csound->esr
so on cycle 1 the current icurTime must be 441 which feels all wrong
I tried subtracting 1 from CS_KCNT used but the led to further
oddities. I know there have been changes to counting but this all
seems gross and we would have noticed earlier surely?
I feel in need of inspiration!
|
| Date | 2018-01-03 14:00 |
| From | Michael Gogins |
| Subject | Re: [Csnd-dev] printk problem |
Time to rewrite this. On Jan 3, 2018 7:46 AM, "jpff" <jpff@codemist.co.uk> wrote: I have been looking at the code in OOps/ugrw1.c but am finding it very |
| Date | 2018-01-03 19:47 |
| From | jpff |
| Subject | Re: [Csnd-dev] printk problem |
I have a version that works but it still seems to me that csound->icurTime s wrong, giving the time at the end of the kcycle when I expect it to be the start. Will commit new version as soon as I get it on a connected computer On Wed, 3 Jan 2018, Michael Gogins wrote: > Time to rewrite this. |