[Cs-dev] Again, should we release a revised 5.17
Date | 2012-05-24 19:04 |
From | jpff |
Subject | [Cs-dev] Again, should we release a revised 5.17 |
with quite a few bug fixes I only know of one now in old-parser ==John ffitch ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Csound-devel mailing list Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net |
Date | 2012-05-24 19:45 |
From | Victor |
Subject | Re: [Cs-dev] Again, should we release a revised 5.17 |
I agree, when? On 24 May 2012, at 19:04, jpff |
Date | 2012-05-25 12:03 |
From | john ffitch |
Subject | Re: [Cs-dev] Again, should we release a revised 5.17 |
How about release early next week? I obviously need to check the csbeats report, but I do not expect it ill take me much effort. I will prepare sub-release notes. Currently called 5.17.11 -- that OK for a bug-fix release? ==John ffitch ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Csound-devel mailing list Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net |
Date | 2012-05-26 16:59 |
From | Anders Genell |
Subject | Re: [Cs-dev] Again, should we release a revised 5.17 |
Attachments | None None |
Hi! I don't know if it me, if it's qutecsound or csound in genral, but as a bugfix release is being discussed, I just wanted to give a heads up: When running the OSCmidisend.csd example (under the OSClisten entry in the manual) on Ubuntu 12.04 with the repository packaged qutecsound / csound (qutecsound 0.6.1 - Using Csound version:5176 Precision:double (64-bit)), I get the following error:
---------------------------------------- c/html/examples/OSCmidisend.csd PortAudio real-time audio module for Csound virtual_keyboard real time MIDI plugin for Csound
0dBFS level = 32768.0 Csound version 5.17 (double samples) Apr 21 2012 libsndfile-1.0.25 WARNING: could not open library '/usr/lib/csound/plugins64-5.2/libosc.so' (liblo.so.7: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory)
WARNING: could not open library '/usr/lib/csound/plugins64-5.2/libpmidi.so' (libportmidi.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory) UnifiedCSD: /usr/share/doc/csound-doc/html/examples/OSCmidisend.csd
STARTING FILE Creating options Creating orchestra Creating score graph init RAWWAVE_PATH: /usr/share/stk/rawwaves/ rtaudio: ALSA module enabled orch compiler:
Macro definition for IPADDRESS Macro definition for PORT instr 1000 error: illegal character + ^ error: illegal character + ^
error: illegal character + ^ error: misplaced comma ^ error: misplaced comma ^
error: no legal opcode6 syntax errors in orchestra. compilation invalid Press return to continue -------------------------------------------- the libs are in the place referred to in the WARNING, and 'all' have permission to read them. Is it a bug, or have something changed that makes the example obsolete? Best regards, /Anders
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:03 PM, john ffitch <jpff@codemist.co.uk> wrote: How about release early next week? I obviously need to check the |
Date | 2012-05-27 08:41 |
From | Victor |
Subject | Re: [Cs-dev] Again, should we release a revised 5.17 |
Attachments | None None |
Maybe the OSC opcodes are not included in the package?
|
Date | 2012-05-27 09:36 |
From | Anders Genell |
Subject | Re: [Cs-dev] Again, should we release a revised 5.17 |
Attachments | None None |
Hm, perhaps not. But what then do the /usr/lib/csound/plugins64-5.2/libosc.so do? Felipe might be able to shed some light? Regards, Anders
|
Date | 2012-05-27 15:54 |
From | Victor |
Subject | Re: [Cs-dev] Again, should we release a revised 5.17 |
Attachments | None None |
Ops I should have recognised this. The opcode cannot be loaded because liblo is not found, and it depends on it. Now why liblo is missing I do not, but it is a packaging issue, not a Csound bug. Victor
|
Date | 2012-05-28 00:30 |
From | Felipe Sateler |
Subject | Re: [Cs-dev] Again, should we release a revised 5.17 |
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Anders Genell |