| Hi,
How about using the string type for this? And then add functions to
codify data into strings? Or would it be clearer to have a blob type?
Cheers,
Andres
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 6:15 PM, John ff wrote:
> I think it would be "easy" to add a new type (say T) to send a table,
> and the krate variable is the table number. It would send the entire
> table as a blob. An alternative that might be possible is to take two
> values, a table number and a length. Anyone care about which?
>
> Regarding listening, the same could be done I think -- still
> investigating./
>
> I would prefer not to try this for the imminent release as I consider
> we are in bugs-only mode at present.
>
> ==John ffitch
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
> definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
> _______________________________________________
> Csound-devel mailing list
> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/ |