Your blocking code (PaBlocking...) works OK on windows. 
I'll have a look on Monday and see if I have any
suggestions.
Btw, thanks for committing my code, I'll send you the
relevant files when I'm back at the office.

Victor

> 
> I have been attempting to use this on the Mac, but it
> stutters something horrid.  Does it work on Windows?  Any
> suggestions as to what could be wrong?
> ==John ffitch
> 

Is there any reason why the localfgens array is terminated
with NULL  as in

static NGFENS localfgens[] = {
   { "tanh", (void(*)(void))tanhtable},
   { NULL, NULL}
};

(from ftest.c)

Should it always be implemented like that?

Victor




Victor Lazzarini
Music Technology Laboratory
Music Department
National University of Ireland, Maynooth 

>>>>> "Victor" == Victor Lazzarini  writes:

 Victor> Is there any reason why the localfgens array is terminated
 Victor> with NULL  as in

Yes there is

 Victor> static NGFENS localfgens[] = {
 Victor>    { "tanh", (void(*)(void))tanhtable},
 Victor>    { NULL, NULL}
 Victor> };

 Victor> (from ftest.c)

 Victor> Should it always be implemented like that?

 Victor> Victor


....but I expect you really want to know why!  There are two options
-- a null terminated list or a count.  If one used a count then there
needs to be a way to pass that count back to the loading code, and I
decided that that opens up too many complication, while a NULL
terminated structure is simple and clean.

==John ff

Thanks for the quick reply.

Does the actual gen number depend on the order
of the loading? If fgen1.so is loaded before fgen2.so, then say
it will have a lower number?

Victor


At 16:53 20/12/2004, you wrote:
> >>>>> "Victor" == Victor Lazzarini  writes:
>
>  Victor> Is there any reason why the localfgens array is terminated
>  Victor> with NULL  as in
>
>Yes there is
>
>  Victor> static NGFENS localfgens[] = {
>  Victor>    { "tanh", (void(*)(void))tanhtable},
>  Victor>    { NULL, NULL}
>  Victor> };
>
>  Victor> (from ftest.c)
>
>  Victor> Should it always be implemented like that?
>
>  Victor> Victor
>
>
>....but I expect you really want to know why!  There are two options
>-- a null terminated list or a count.  If one used a count then there
>needs to be a way to pass that count back to the loading code, and I
>decided that that opens up too many complication, while a NULL
>terminated structure is simple and clean.
>
>==John ff

Victor Lazzarini
Music Technology Laboratory
Music Department
National University of Ireland, Maynooth 

Yes; numbers are allocated in a simple increasing fashion.  Could not
think of an alternative!
==John ffitch