jpff@codemist.co.uk wrote:

 > But if i get the parser rewrite it is all rather irrelevant which is
 > why i have been opposed to this change.

I did not know about the new parser. As the CVS source (which is assumed
to be the most recent development version) has the original parser,
and not much was heard about the planned "new" one in more than two years,
I made the assumption that the old parser will be made re-entrant and used
in Csound5.
Nevertheless, if I fix bugs in the existing parser code, that should not
affect any work on the new version, and so is not expected to be a problem.

 > Did the files filter2, bus, midiops2, midiops3, oscbnk,spectra,
 > ugens6, uggab and ugmoss get changed as well? Did not notice

Yes, all relevant files were changed, including those that you
mentioned and many others. I scanned the entire CVS tree with
find/grep, and replaced both Str() (this was mostly done with sed,
but a few problematic files were edited), and '_' in internal
opcode names (not as easy as Str(), edited the files manually),
in all source files that matched.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net