Re: [Csnd-dev] Large numbers of input arguments to opcodes
| Date | 2019-01-08 15:34 |
| From | John |
| Subject | Re: [Csnd-dev] Large numbers of input arguments to opcodes |
Removing the restriction would involve major changes essentially to
every opcode, or at least that is the only way I can see to do it.
So the current state in github is that there is a new variant of
fillarray
i[] fillarray "file_name"
k[] fillarray "file_name"
where the file is a list of numbers, space or comma separated and
dealing in a limited way with comments starting with ; or # until eol.
This is the same as gen23
There is also
i[] string2array {{ ....}}
k[] string2array {{ ....}}
which does much the same for a string except no comment skipping
The name of the second is not good so I would be happy with a new
name. the fillarray has been tested and seems correct. string2array
only lightly tested as of now.
While doing this processing removed some restrictions on 1 and 2D
only arrays and some better checking.
Please try and give feedback
|
| Date | 2019-01-08 21:41 |
| From | joachim heintz |
| Subject | Re: [Csnd-dev] Large numbers of input arguments to opcodes |
first test shows for me that there is one extra zero for each dimension
of the array. so for this code (the txt file is attached)
giSnippets[] fillarray "snippets_lines.txt"
printarray giSnippets
i get one extra zero at the beginning
0: 0.0000 1.0000 0.6970 3.8500 66.2000 -38.8000 0.7700 2.0000 2.1250
3.8400 89.4300
10: -26.8000 0.4300 3.0000 2.3460 7.5580 55.4600 -31.3000 0.7500
4.0000 2.5430 etc
wheras for
giSnippets[][] init 765, 6
giSnippets fillarray "snippets_lines.txt"
printarray giSnippets
i get two extra zeros at the beginning:
0: 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.6970 3.8500 66.2000
1: -38.8000 0.7700 2.0000 2.1250 3.8400 89.4300
2: -26.8000 0.4300 3.0000 2.3460 7.5580 55.4600
otherwise, the content looks ok.
when i put all my text in the string2array opcode, it seems to struggle
with the length of the string, but with no obvious result. i can
interrupt, but it does not seem to be able to load such long strings.
best -
joachim
On 08/01/19 16:34, John wrote:
> Removing the restriction would involve major changes essentially to
> every opcode, or at least that is the only way I can see to do it.
>
> So the current state in github is that there is a new variant of
> fillarray
>
> i[] fillarray "file_name"
> k[] fillarray "file_name"
>
> where the file is a list of numbers, space or comma separated and
> dealing in a limited way with comments starting with ; or # until eol.
> This is the same as gen23
>
> There is also
>
> i[] string2array {{ ....}}
> k[] string2array {{ ....}}
>
> which does much the same for a string except no comment skipping
>
> The name of the second is not good so I would be happy with a new
> name. the fillarray has been tested and seems correct. string2array
> only lightly tested as of now.
>
> While doing this processing removed some restrictions on 1 and 2D
> only arrays and some better checking.
>
> Please try and give feedback
>
> ==John ffitch |
| Date | 2019-01-09 14:56 |
| From | jpff |
| Subject | Re: [Csnd-dev] Large numbers of input arguments to opcodes |
Apologies -- my stupidity on a ae change. OK in github
On Tue, 8 Jan 2019, joachim heintz wrote:
> first test shows for me that there is one extra zero for each dimension of
> the array. so for this code (the txt file is attached)
>
> giSnippets[] fillarray "snippets_lines.txt"
> printarray giSnippets
>
> i get one extra zero at the beginning
> 0: 0.0000 1.0000 0.6970 3.8500 66.2000 -38.8000 0.7700 2.0000 2.1250 3.8400
> 89.4300
> 10: -26.8000 0.4300 3.0000 2.3460 7.5580 55.4600 -31.3000 0.7500 4.0000
> 2.5430 etc
>
> wheras for
> giSnippets[][] init 765, 6
> giSnippets fillarray "snippets_lines.txt"
> printarray giSnippets
>
> i get two extra zeros at the beginning:
> 0: 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.6970 3.8500 66.2000
> 1: -38.8000 0.7700 2.0000 2.1250 3.8400 89.4300
> 2: -26.8000 0.4300 3.0000 2.3460 7.5580 55.4600
>
> otherwise, the content looks ok.
>
> when i put all my text in the string2array opcode, it seems to struggle with
> the length of the string, but with no obvious result. i can interrupt, but
> it does not seem to be able to load such long strings.
>
> best -
> joachim
>
>
>
>
>
> On 08/01/19 16:34, John wrote:
>> Removing the restriction would involve major changes essentially to
>> every opcode, or at least that is the only way I can see to do it.
>>
>> So the current state in github is that there is a new variant of
>> fillarray
>>
>> i[] fillarray "file_name"
>> k[] fillarray "file_name"
>>
>> where the file is a list of numbers, space or comma separated and
>> dealing in a limited way with comments starting with ; or # until eol.
>> This is the same as gen23
>>
>> There is also
>>
>> i[] string2array {{ ....}}
>> k[] string2array {{ ....}}
>>
>> which does much the same for a string except no comment skipping
>>
>> The name of the second is not good so I would be happy with a new
>> name. the fillarray has been tested and seems correct. string2array
>> only lightly tested as of now.
>>
>> While doing this processing removed some restrictions on 1 and 2D
>> only arrays and some better checking.
>>
>> Please try and give feedback
>>
>> ==John ffitch
>> |
| Date | 2019-01-09 16:55 |
| From | joachim heintz |
| Subject | Re: [Csnd-dev] Large numbers of input arguments to opcodes |
thanks! the file reading works now, also for 2 dimensions.
i cannot get any success for the string2array version. certainly, the
string input for my example is 767 x 6 fields; but should it not work
anyway?
joachim
On 09/01/19 15:56, jpff wrote:
> Apologies -- my stupidity on a ae change. OK in github
>
>
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2019, joachim heintz wrote:
>
>> first test shows for me that there is one extra zero for each
>> dimension of the array. so for this code (the txt file is attached)
>>
>> giSnippets[] fillarray "snippets_lines.txt"
>> printarray giSnippets
>>
>> i get one extra zero at the beginning
>> 0: 0.0000 1.0000 0.6970 3.8500 66.2000 -38.8000 0.7700 2.0000 2.1250
>> 3.8400 89.4300
>> 10: -26.8000 0.4300 3.0000 2.3460 7.5580 55.4600 -31.3000 0.7500
>> 4.0000 2.5430 etc
>>
>> wheras for
>> giSnippets[][] init 765, 6
>> giSnippets fillarray "snippets_lines.txt"
>> printarray giSnippets
>>
>> i get two extra zeros at the beginning:
>> 0: 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000 0.6970 3.8500 66.2000
>> 1: -38.8000 0.7700 2.0000 2.1250 3.8400 89.4300
>> 2: -26.8000 0.4300 3.0000 2.3460 7.5580 55.4600
>>
>> otherwise, the content looks ok.
>>
>> when i put all my text in the string2array opcode, it seems to
>> struggle with the length of the string, but with no obvious result. i
>> can interrupt, but it does not seem to be able to load such long strings.
>>
>> best -
>> joachim
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 08/01/19 16:34, John wrote:
>>> Removing the restriction would involve major changes essentially to
>>> every opcode, or at least that is the only way I can see to do it.
>>>
>>> So the current state in github is that there is a new variant of
>>> fillarray
>>>
>>> i[] fillarray "file_name"
>>> k[] fillarray "file_name"
>>>
>>> where the file is a list of numbers, space or comma separated and
>>> dealing in a limited way with comments starting with ; or # until eol.
>>> This is the same as gen23
>>>
>>> There is also
>>>
>>> i[] string2array {{ ....}}
>>> k[] string2array {{ ....}}
>>>
>>> which does much the same for a string except no comment skipping
>>>
>>> The name of the second is not good so I would be happy with a new
>>> name. the fillarray has been tested and seems correct. string2array
>>> only lightly tested as of now.
>>>
>>> While doing this processing removed some restrictions on 1 and 2D
>>> only arrays and some better checking.
>>>
>>> Please try and give feedback
>>>
>>> ==John ffitch
>>>
>> |
| Date | 2019-01-09 17:04 |
| From | John ff |
| Subject | Re: [Csnd-dev] Large numbers of input arguments to opcodes |
Oh dear. It worked on my tests after fixing a fence post error where it lost the last number.
Will check again.
Sent from TypeApp
On 9 Jan 2019, at 16:56, joachim heintz <jh@joachimheintz.de> wrote: thanks! the file reading works now, also for 2 dimensions. |