[Cs-dev] parallel processing panel at ICMC
Date | 2008-08-31 20:33 |
From | victor |
Subject | [Cs-dev] parallel processing panel at ICMC |
Attachments | None None |
Hello everyone,
just a quick e-mail in relation to the panel at
ICMC. John was there and
might add details to these.
The overall tone was 'yes it is a good idea; we'll
have to do it, but we
don't know how yet.' I asked the question we
wanted to know:
who is doing it? They basically shrugged and said,
"well max has
the poly object...", and then someone said that
SCSynth could be
run several separate, but unconnected, processes,
to what I replied,
so can any other program...
The only thing I found useful was to hear the FAUST
guy talk about
their multiprocessor output usimg openMP. They also
have experience
with their parallel version of Jack.
Has anyone looked at OpenMP. Looks dead easy to
use, it seems available
across the board for all support platforms (gcc
4.2). Perhaps we can use
that instead of pthreads?
But overall, they all seemed clueless. The
discussions in this list seemed
to be better informed. The added joke was Miller
Puckette saying that with
his three year PC he could run six PVs so he was
happy and did not want
to bother with it.
Regards
Victor
|
Date | 2008-08-31 23:33 |
From | Richard Dobson |
Subject | Re: [Cs-dev] parallel processing panel at ICMC |
victor wrote: .. > > The only thing I found useful was to hear the FAUST guy talk about > their multiprocessor output usimg openMP. They also have experience > with their parallel version of Jack. > Yes, quite tempted to look at FAUST. Julius Smith says he is implementing all his dsp examples from his online books using it. > Has anyone looked at OpenMP. Am looking at it (but mostly engaged just now in SIMD programming for the Clearspeed cards); but I only have access to dual-core machines, which I don't consider adequate for testing such things. Does anyone on the list have the 8-core Mac Pro? Outside my budget, sadly. Looks dead easy to use, it seems available > across the board for all support platforms (gcc 4.2). Perhaps we can use > that instead of pthreads? > > But overall, they all seemed clueless. The discussions in this list seemed > to be better informed. The added joke was Miller Puckette saying that with > his three year PC he could run six PVs so he was happy and did not want > to bother with it. > Wot, only six? Not much use for morphing two 5.1 streams. So, no immediate prospect of a spv~ opcode in PD, then! Richard Dobson ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Csound-devel mailing list Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net |
Date | 2008-08-31 23:40 |
From | peiman khosravi |
Subject | Re: [Cs-dev] parallel processing panel at ICMC |
I think they have new 8-core Mac Pros at the uni studio, I may be able to do some testing there if they let me :-) Peiman On 31 Aug 2008, at 23:33, Richard Dobson wrote: > victor wrote: > .. >> >> The only thing I found useful was to hear the FAUST guy talk about >> their multiprocessor output usimg openMP. They also have experience >> with their parallel version of Jack. >> > > Yes, quite tempted to look at FAUST. Julius Smith says he is > implementing all his dsp examples from his online books using it. > >> Has anyone looked at OpenMP. > > Am looking at it (but mostly engaged just now in SIMD programming for > the Clearspeed cards); but I only have access to dual-core machines, > which I don't consider adequate for testing such things. Does > anyone on > the list have the 8-core Mac Pro? Outside my budget, sadly. > > Looks dead easy to use, it seems available >> across the board for all support platforms (gcc 4.2). Perhaps we >> can use >> that instead of pthreads? >> >> But overall, they all seemed clueless. The discussions in this >> list seemed >> to be better informed. The added joke was Miller Puckette saying >> that with >> his three year PC he could run six PVs so he was happy and did not >> want >> to bother with it. >> > > Wot, only six? Not much use for morphing two 5.1 streams. So, no > immediate prospect of a spv~ opcode in PD, then! > > Richard Dobson > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win > great prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in > the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > Csound-devel mailing list > Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Csound-devel mailing list Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net |
Date | 2008-09-01 03:07 |
From | "Steven Yi" |
Subject | Re: [Cs-dev] parallel processing panel at ICMC |
Attachments | None |