Csound Csound-dev Csound-tekno Search About

Re: [Cs-dev] Draft Release Notes: Sone Plugin

Date2008-12-19 20:41
Fromvictor
SubjectRe: [Cs-dev] Draft Release Notes: Sone Plugin
I can access JStor, but this article is not there. There are a couple of
others by the same author, though.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steven Yi" 
To: "Art Hunkins" ; "Developer discussions" 

Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Cs-dev] Draft Release Notes: Sone Plugin


>I did a quick search and the article is available for a fee at:
>
> http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=JASMAN000027000005000815000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes
>
> I don't know if anyone has JStor or other means to look at the article 
> freely.
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 9:54 AM, Art Hunkins  wrote:
>> John,
>>
>> Yes, your suggestion should work.
>>
>> FWIW, here is the complete page from the Music360 manual:
>>
>> GEN13
>>
>> This routine simply stores 512 values along a monotonic curve, like 
>> GEN01;
>> but in this case only the first and last values are specified and
>> interpolation is made according to the sone scale of amplitude 
>> relationship.
>> This scale was devised by S.S. Stevens, and is described in his article 
>> "The
>> Measurement of Loudness" in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of
>> America, Vol 27, No. 5, Sept. 1955.) Thus GEN13 may provide a better
>> approximation to perceived loudness than GEN01 or any other 
>> GEN-subroutine.
>>
>> P4 and P5 specify the initial and terminal values, and all other 
>> parameter
>> fields are ignored.
>>
>> Art Hunkins
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "jpff" 
>> To: "Art Hunkins" ; "Developer discussions"
>> 
>> Cc: 
>> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 1:22 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Cs-dev] Draft Release Notes: Sone Plugin
>>
>>
>>> Art
>>>  There is a real problem with making the perceived and physical value
>>>  coincide at zero as the formula is per = k * phy^alpha and this
>>>  collapses at zero values.  If anyone had the code from Music360, or
>>>  even the manual page, it might be possible to determine what is
>>>  required.
>>>    One could fiddle so zero at start of table, next point agrees and
>>>  then follow the formula.  Would that be OK?
>>> ==John ffitch
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Csound-devel mailing list
>>> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> Csound-devel mailing list
>> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Csound-devel mailing list
> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net