I suspect Richard means, an opcode that behaves in a platform-specific manner or that is not all available on all the main platforms. #ifdefs in the opcode itself should not be a problem.

Regards,
Mike

-----Original Message-----
>From: Rory Walsh 
>Sent: Jun 8, 2006 4:05 PM
>To: Developer discussions 
>Subject: Re: [Cs-dev] sensekey opcode modification request
>
>> do you mean the max/msp/pd csound~ object or what?
>
>I think Richard is talking about those actual systems, Pd and Max that 
>is. They allow this, they must have some #ifdef's for different OS stuff 
>that helps to build across platforms, couldn't it be done like that?
>
>
>Rory.
>
>> -m
>> 
>> On Jun 8, 2006, at 12:48 PM, Dr. Richard Boulanger wrote:
>> 
>>> I would not want a platform-specific opcode.  In fact, I am using
>>> MacCsound to prototype
>>> orchestras and demos for a Linux system - (Thanks so much for
>>> MacCsound5!!! Just the very very
>>> minute I needed it.  You are amazing.)
>>>
>>> I will be happy to tell you more about this little linux Csound
>>> system I am working on (with Barry Vercoe)
>>> once I make sure with him that I can tell you about it.
>>>
>>> Needless to say....  sensekey, and xyin would be nice to have working
>>> in a full-featured and straightforward way
>>> (as they do in Max/MSP and PD for example)
>>>
>>> Wishing you and all the developers all the best.
>>>
>>> Rick
>>>
>>> On Jun 8, 2006, at 3:14 PM, matt ingalls wrote:
>>>
>>>> that's a good idea too.  or i can just implement Rick's new opcode
>>>> with the same approach.
>>>>
>>>> if this is in conflict with other platforms and/or something that
>>>> would
>>>> never possibly be incorporated into the canonical sources, i would
>>>> just assume use a reserved control channel name rather than
>>>> create a new platform-specific ocpode.  -- what do you want Rick?
>>>>
>>>> -m
>>>>
>>>> On Jun 8, 2006, at 10:21 AM, Istvan Varga wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> And, of course, the host can also just replace the sensekey
>>>>> opcode (with csoundAppendOpcode()) and implement the slightly
>>>>> modified behavior described below.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thursday 08 June 2006 20:15, matt wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> i could see making values < -1 be an "offkey",
>>>>>> returning the negative value of the ascii key released.
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Csound-devel mailing list
>>>>> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Csound-devel mailing list
>>>> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Csound-devel mailing list
>>> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Csound-devel mailing list
>> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel
>> 
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Csound-devel mailing list
>Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel





_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net