On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 21:38:01 +0100 (BST),
John ffitch  wrote:

> You may remember that I was explicitly excluded from IV's work, and
> so I have simply erased it from my mind.[1]
>
> Also remember that his work is NOT LGPL and so using in in Csound
> (new versions) is suspect. Yes i did ask him if he was happy with
> LGPL, and no he never responded.

I have not read the Csound lists for a few months, nor did I
know about the source code beind LGPL'd. In fact, I have not
changed my code for quit some time, and not sure if I will continue
developing it at any time.
This may explain why I did not respond to posts (also note that
I found that my mail account at csounds.com is no longer functional).
On the other hand, I have nothing against releasing any of the code
I contributed under the LGPL, or any other license not more restrictive
than the LGPL, assuming that I am credited for writing the code.
As I said above, I no longer maintain any Csound sources, but, if there
is demand for it, I can release a cleaned-up and bug fixed version
of 4.21.2, with LGPL license.





_______________________________________________________________________
Kezdő angol online kurzus e-mailben. Nyelvtani magyarázatok,
feladatok megoldásokkal mindössze 3,500 Ft/hó árért.
http://mailbox.hu/angol/



_______________________________________________________________________
Kezdő angol online kurzus e-mailben. Nyelvtani magyarázatok,
feladatok megoldásokkal mindössze 3,500 Ft/hó árért.
http://mailbox.hu/angol/



_______________________________________________________________________
Kezdő angol online kurzus e-mailben. Nyelvtani magyarázatok,
feladatok megoldásokkal mindössze 3,500 Ft/hó árért.
http://mailbox.hu/angol/

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, [iso-8859-2] "Varga István"  wrote:

> On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 21:38:01 +0100 (BST),
> John ffitch  wrote:
> 
> > You may remember that I was explicitly excluded from IV's work, and
> > so I have simply erased it from my mind.[1]
> >
> > Also remember that his work is NOT LGPL and so using in in Csound
> > (new versions) is suspect. Yes i did ask him if he was happy with
> > LGPL, and no he never responded.
> 
> I have not read the Csound lists for a few months, nor did I
> know about the source code beind LGPL'd. In fact, I have not
> changed my code for quit some time, and not sure if I will continue
> developing it at any time.
> This may explain why I did not respond to posts (also note that
> I found that my mail account at csounds.com is no longer functional).
> On the other hand, I have nothing against releasing any of the code
> I contributed under the LGPL, or any other license not more restrictive
> than the LGPL, assuming that I am credited for writing the code.
> As I said above, I no longer maintain any Csound sources, but, if there
> is demand for it, I can release a cleaned-up and bug fixed version
> of 4.21.2, with LGPL license.

Please! please!  As a matter of fact I would like to take your sources and 
add gnu autotools to it so it can be built easier on a varity of 
architectures.

Matt

Thank you István, I think alot of people apreciate this!

-- 
   Anders Andersson   |   /"\
    Elektron ESI AB   |   \ /     ASCII Ribbon Campaign
   pipe@elektron.se   |    X      Against HTML Mail
www.machinedrum.com   |   / \

On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, [iso-8859-2] "Varga István"  wrote:

> On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 21:38:01 +0100 (BST),
> John ffitch  wrote:
> 
> > You may remember that I was explicitly excluded from IV's work, and
> > so I have simply erased it from my mind.[1]
> >
> > Also remember that his work is NOT LGPL and so using in in Csound
> > (new versions) is suspect. Yes i did ask him if he was happy with
> > LGPL, and no he never responded.
> 
> I have not read the Csound lists for a few months, nor did I
> know about the source code beind LGPL'd. In fact, I have not
> changed my code for quit some time, and not sure if I will continue
> developing it at any time.
> This may explain why I did not respond to posts (also note that
> I found that my mail account at csounds.com is no longer functional).
> On the other hand, I have nothing against releasing any of the code
> I contributed under the LGPL, or any other license not more restrictive
> than the LGPL, assuming that I am credited for writing the code.
> As I said above, I no longer maintain any Csound sources, but, if there
> is demand for it, I can release a cleaned-up and bug fixed version
> of 4.21.2, with LGPL license.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Kezdõ angol online kurzus e-mailben. Nyelvtani magyarázatok,
> feladatok megoldásokkal mindössze 3,500 Ft/hó árért.
> http://mailbox.hu/angol/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Kezdõ angol online kurzus e-mailben. Nyelvtani magyarázatok,
> feladatok megoldásokkal mindössze 3,500 Ft/hó árért.
> http://mailbox.hu/angol/
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Kezdõ angol online kurzus e-mailben. Nyelvtani magyarázatok,
> feladatok megoldásokkal mindössze 3,500 Ft/hó árért.
> http://mailbox.hu/angol/
> 

Istvan, 

    Glad to see that you are back!  And it is good that your contributions
will "live on" under the new LGPL'd Csound.

Anthony Kozar
akozar@utnet.utoledo.edu

On 7/29/03 9:35 AM, Varga István etched in stone:

> On the other hand, I have nothing against releasing any of the code
> I contributed under the LGPL, or any other license not more restrictive
> than the LGPL, assuming that I am credited for writing the code.

Thank you Istvan for the agreement to LGPL.  That makes me very
happy.  Will adjust my records.
==John ffitch