I think that's a good idea. But wouldn't it
be better to make the arrays into linked lists,
if we are talking about extending them?

Victor
>
> Victor Lazzarini wrote:
>
> > I'd say its better if we add the functions, as I
> > don't think it's a good idea for host apps to be
> > accessing the CSOUND struct directly. What do we
> > need to agree exactly? I thought these were just
> > simple control channels. Can't we have Set/Get
> > functions for them?
>
> There are also audio channels. In addition, should the
> set/get functions automatically extend the arrays like
> the opcodes (in this case perhaps the opcodes could just
> call the API functions) ?
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo
> App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win
> a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here
> to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
> _______________________________________________
> Csound-devel mailing list
> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP.  Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net