| I am completely for it. We should support one PV output analysis format only,
will avoid lots of confusion.
Victor
At 13:40 03/06/2005, you wrote:
>How do we feel about removing pvanal totally, and using the pvxanal
>system, which is more secure, deals with multiple channels etc.? I
>think the pvoc code needs to retain the ability to read the older
>format, but there is no need to create new versions.
>
>It also seems that we need to add a bunch of functions to the API
>(besseli, kaiser,...) or to replicate the code.
>
>==John ffitch
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
>Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
>Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
>Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
>_______________________________________________
>Csound-devel mailing list
>Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel
Victor Lazzarini
Music Technology Laboratory
Music Department
National University of Ireland, Maynooth
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo.
Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo!
Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own
Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net |