That's fine with me as well.

Hopefully, Gab will do likewise - in CsoundAV.

Art Hunkins

----- Original Message ----- 
From: 
To: "Csound Developers Discussion List" 
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 10:02 AM
Subject: [CSOUND-DEV:5080] Re: WinCsound5


It's fine with me if we just remove it. I would prefer that, actually. Bad
to have several ways of doing more or less exactly the same thing...

Original Message:
-----------------
From:  jpff@codemist.co.uk
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 08:43:31 +0100
To: csound-dev@eartha.mills.edu
Subject: [CSOUND-DEV:5079] Re: WinCsound5


Sorry, did not know I was being asked anything.  I think schedwhen was
my attempt to introduce programmable event scheduling, and it almost
worked.  Rasmus (? we do not seem to have heard from him lately?) then
wrote schedkwhen as a response -- that is to make it work.  I rather
thought that schedwhen would slowly fade away.....
==John ffitch


--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .

Hi,
Is there a way to ask the csound API for tempo information? I couldn't
find it in csoundCore.h or in cppcsound. Am I missing something?

Andres

I've been working on improving compatibility for vst4cs, and things are 
going well, but I found something I can't figure out. Polyiblit and Claw 
only work well if a vstprogset is sent before sending any notes. I can't 
see why this should affect since on  void VSTPlugin::Init()  (line 446) 
there is:
Dispatch(effSetProgram  ,  0, 0, NULL, 0.0f);
Any clues?


Michael,
This is just a technical question. I'm wondering why it is taking now
longer to build vst4cs. Is it because of it's interaction with the
csound API? Is there a way to improve this?

Andrés