Csound Csound-dev Csound-tekno Search About

[CSOUND-DEV:3551] Re: csound/configure.ac revamped

Date2003-11-26 21:30
From"Michael Gogins"
Subject[CSOUND-DEV:3551] Re: csound/configure.ac revamped
I used to have problems with widgets.cpp because with my compilers, std
namespace gets scanned, which breaks widgets.cpp. If you prefix each stream
symbol with std:: (e.g. std::ostream for ostream) everything works. Plus I
removed Windows-specific dialogs and replaced them with FLTK dialogs. I
thought I had committed my changes, but I didn't see them in CVS and I don't
compile this file currently.

============================================
Michael Gogins
gogins at pipeline period com
Irreducible Productions
CsoundVST, an extended version of Csound for programming music and sound
Available at http://sourceforge.net/projects/csound/
============================================


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "stevenyi" 
To: "Csound Developers Discussion List" 
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 3:11 AM
Subject: [CSOUND-DEV:3531] Re: csound/configure.ac revamped


> Hi John R,
>
> I spent the past hour trying to figure out what's going on with
> widgets.cpp.  All I've ascertained so far is that I can compile the same
> widgets.cpp with Makefile.lnx but can not with the autogenerated
> Makefile.  So it seems that it's some kind of configuration issue,
> though what it is I'm not sure yet.
>
> steven
>
>
> On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 11:49, steven wrote:
> > Hi John,
> >
> > I'm pretty sure I have the latest widgets.cpp as I was doing diffs this
> > morning with the other revisions to see if anything else had changed
> > beside the autoheader.h.  My last guess was that it was something to do
> > with the Makefile generated, as it didn't seem to have all of the flags
> > there (i.e. -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti) (have to confirm this, didn't
> > have a chance to spend too much time with this.  Sorry for not being
> > more helpful in this; I should have some time tonight to work on
> > figuring what's going on).
> >
> > steven
> >
> > John D. Ramsdell wrote:
> >
> > >stevenyi  writes:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>Hi John R,
> > >>
> > >>I took a quick test and look at the autobuild system and it's nice
what
> > >>you've done.  I ran into a problem with widgets.cpp, but don't have
time
> > >>to look into as I'm running off to work now.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >The only change I made to widgets.cpp is to have it include
> > >autoheader.h as its first action.  If your copy of widgets.cpp does
> > >not mention autoheader.h, do a cvs update to get the latest version.
> > >
> > >John
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>