Some time ago I ventured some opinions on these lists to the effect that I 
could hear differences between the same piece compiled with the 
single-precision version of Csound, versus the double-precision version, 
even if both versions are rendered at 96000 samples per second at ksmps = 1 
to floating point soundfiles, and the score files are completely identical.

Well, I did a double-blind test using WinABX software, and it turns out that 
I actually can hear differences -- in some pieces, in some places. The 
double version sounds less shrill in some spots.

If you're interested, check out:

http://ruccas.org/pub/Gogins/csoundabx.pdf 




-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net