And, as mentioned before, the reorganization makes it useful beyond just 32/64, but also debug/release versions. i.e. no longer having to recompile from scratch to get all the symbols in to do a gdb session. steven On 11/7/05, Iain Duncan wrote: > > > Well, as you know, I think having 32 bits and 64 bits is a bad idea. It should just be 64 bits. So I am utterly indifferent to this question. I never build or use 32 bits. > > > > It continues to escape me why everyone else doesn't do the same. If it sometimes sounds better and is inarguably more precise and only runs a little slower, and oh yes it's much simpler to only build for 64 bits, what's the big deal? Are we musicians here or software engineering speed demons? > > > > At the end of the day, Csound is a musical instrument and its only purpose is to make music. > > Ah, but some of us are live performers, and the speed *does* matter, > very very much. I am and will be for many years yet picking which > corners to cut in order to get close to what I want running in real > time. So I think it is good to still be able to run 32 bits. > > Iain > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download > it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own > Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php > _______________________________________________ > Csound-devel mailing list > Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Csound-devel mailing list Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net