Well, the sources would have to be moved to a src directory, as I've explained before, to take advantage of the BuildDir functionality. If I could have found an elegant way to do this without moving sources in the first place to src, I would have chosen that route. It is the reason I suggested moving all source files into src in the first place. The generation of exectubles and libraries to a separate directory structure is not as critical to me; desirable, but not anything I could do without. If the libraries are not renamed however to use libxxxx64.so naming, I think the above will be a little less useful as they will have to overwrite each other all the time. The binaries don't clash currently since they do follow that convention. steven On 11/8/05, Istvan Varga wrote: > Well, if the changes can be limited to writing object files to a > separate directory, that should be fine, as long as the sources > are not moved, nor are executables or libraries written to a > different location. Otherwise, I do not agree with the idea. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Csound-devel mailing list Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net