On Monday 15 January 2007 19:31, jpff wrote:
> Is there any reason why these changes are not needed in scansyn as
> well?
>
> ==John ffitch

the assignment to x0 and x2 in the initw function could (and IMO should) 
certainly be applied.  however it might subtly change the sound of the 
output. it depends if you favour exact backward compatibility vs. following 
the manual specification...

the other two changes were particular to the functionality of xscanu of 
reading directly from a connection matrix file.

there's also another bug i'm currently chasing in both scans and xscans where 
interpolations greater than linear cause periodic glitches in the output.  i 
don't have a fix for this yet.

i'm very glad that this project is receptive to patches at all.  unlike gcc, 
where it appears patches from non core developers simply fall on the floor.

lily.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net