I have some orchestras that use this but not many and have no
objections to the change as well.

steven

On 10/9/05, Istvan Varga <istvan_v@fibermail.hu> wrote:
> jpff@codemist.co.uk wrote:
>
> > Would it not be more consistent to have the names loop_lt and loop_gt
> > than loop_l and loop_g which are not clear names?
>
> I do not generally object to this change, although some existing
> orchestras may need to be updated for the new names.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
> Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
> and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> Csound-devel mailing list
> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions,
and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net