On Thursday 18 May 2006 23:27, David Akbari wrote:

> I think Istvan was absolutely thinking for the benefit and future of 
> Csound when thinking of a solution that reaches beyond the current 
> static number of 24 outargs.

Actually, I already have ideas about how the current UDO implementation
can be changed to efficiently handle up to something like 256 input and/or
output arguments; adding the new types (S and f) is trickier, but may also
be possible at a small cost in performance.
It appears that I am now locked out from canonical Csound CVS access, but
I am creating an alternate "unofficial" project that can be used for
releasing such improvements and new features if there is enough interest.