Hi Istvan, What about: csoundSetChanK csoundGetChanK csoundSetChanA csoundGetChanA It's a bit shorter and I think directly reflects the relationship to the chan bus. steven On 11/6/05, Istvan Varga wrote: > Victor Lazzarini wrote: > > > I'd say its better if we add the functions, as I > > don't think it's a good idea for host apps to be > > accessing the CSOUND struct directly. What do we > > need to agree exactly? I thought these were just > > simple control channels. Can't we have Set/Get > > functions for them? > > I have these functions in my (not yet committed) sources. Are the > function names OK ? I think there may be some confusion with the > named channels. > > PUBLIC int csoundSetControlInputChannel(CSOUND *, MYFLT value, int n); > PUBLIC int csoundGetControlOutputChannel(CSOUND *, MYFLT *value, int n); > PUBLIC int csoundSetAudioInputChannel(CSOUND *, const MYFLT *value, int n); > PUBLIC int csoundGetAudioOutputChannel(CSOUND *, MYFLT *value, int n); > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download > it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own > Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php > _______________________________________________ > Csound-devel mailing list > Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Csound-devel mailing list Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net