I would prefer just replacing the old code in a case like this. I doubt anyone would have problems with more accurate code. It looks sufficiently light not to have performance concerns. I just noticed the code but I may have lost any mail about it -- I am way behind again with a weekend away and then a cold ==John ff Quoting Michael Gogins : > It does what the comment in the code says it does. It is more precise than > cpsmidinn, and I would be surprised if it were significantly slower. I > introduced this opcode because I found that the cpsmidinn opcode was > computing results with what, to me, seemed insufficient precision. > > It is fine with me to replace the existing implementation (table lookup) > with the new one (log and pow) in the existing opcodes, or to introduce new > implementations and keep the old ones. But I need the precision. Which > approach would you prefer? > > Best, > Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Csound-devel mailing list Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net