Hi Istvan,

Thanks as always for the explanation!  I think the note deactivation
works fine for what is going on in fluidNote, which was my main
concern.  It seems more likely a concern to do note cleanup type
operations rather than operations at note off, so I'd vote to not
implement for now.

Thanks,
steven

On 6/16/05, Istvan Varga <istvan_v@fibermail.hu> wrote:
> Steven Yi wrote:
> 
> > Oops, sorry John about the somewhat erroneous info on
> > csoundModuleDestroy!  Istvan, what is the difference between note
> > turnoff and deactivation?
> 
> For notes with no release, there is no difference.
> Otherwise, on a note-off, the instrument first enters the release
> stage, and when that ends, it is deactivated:
> 
>      +--------+
>      |        |\ release
>      |        | \
> ----+--------+--+------
>      |        |  |
>   note on  note  deactivate
>             off
> 
> There is currently no callback for the note-off (you can detect it by
> watching the release flag at k-rate), only for deactivation.
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Csound-devel mailing list
> Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/csound-devel
>


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net