On Tuesday 24 January 2006 00:08, Richard Dobson wrote:

> The issue that would have to be addressed (and whcih I have always seen as the 
> main obstacle to the proposed changes) is indeed the definition of the guard 
> point, on which many opcodes rely. In the current scheme, the contents of the 
> opcode are indicated by the table size being either a pow_of_2 or pow_of_2+1, 
> relying on the special significance of the pow_of_2 value.

Probably that is why the non-power of two table sizes are specified
as negative numbers. In this mode, the size always includes the guard
point, like in the pow_of_2+1 case above. A p3 of -101 means 100 samples
and a guard point which is not copied from sample 0.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Csound-devel mailing list
Csound-devel@lists.sourceforge.net